【摘要】我国新《侵权责任法》对侵权行为的规定，总的来讲，其较前并未形成历史性的突破，严格地说，仅仅是对原有法律规定和司法解释的完善，尤其是对侵权行为的具体赔偿方式没有进行大统一的规定，社会生活实践的客观要求和学术理论界的研究成果并未能在立法上得到充分体现。本文从侵权行为发生后，对不同受害人赔偿按照“同命同价”还是“同命不同价”观点对比出发，通过对我国《侵权责任法》研究，再对国外相关立法例的借鉴和研究，建议采用“同命同价”理念来针对受害人的损害赔偿，并从理论、实践、立法趋势等方面去支持该设想，力图为我国侵权行为发生后对受害人的法律损害赔偿问题修改提供一些思路。通过梳理我国现行人身侵权损害赔偿制度中分散多元多层级立法的大致脉络,提出生命的双重价值观命题以理性关照“同命同价”与“同命不同价”的热议,思考如何使侵权死亡赔偿范围及标准更趋于正当合理等问题,为完善我国相关立法略尽绵薄之力。
【关键词】同命同价 同命不同价 受害人 法律赔偿
【Abstract】China is currently in creation and sound through the civil tort law legislation --- to actively respond to all accidents result in personal and property damage to the critical period. China's new "tort" provisions of the violations, in general, did not form its previous historic breakthrough, Strictly speaking, only the original law and the judicial interpretation of the sound, especially for violations of specific forms of reparation without major uniform requirements, the objective requirements of social life and the practice of academic research community, and not in Fully reflected in legislation. From the infringement occurred, according to different compensation for the victims, "the same fate with the price " or "Life with price " starting point comparison, Through the study of tort law, and then the relevant legislation of foreign countries for reference and research, recommended "the same fate with the price " concept to damages for the victims, and from the theory, practice and legislative trends, etc. to support the idea After trying for the victims of violations of damages to modify the law to provide some ideas.
【Key words】Same price for the same fate Price for Life with Victims Legal redress
