内容摘要：盗窃罪与故意毁坏财物罪一般可以通过分析行为是否具有非法占有目的来加以区分。而对于一些采用破坏性手段进行盗窃或者是基于毁坏目的而盗窃财物等等情况，是定盗窃罪还是故意毁坏财物罪，或是其他罪名，是构成一罪还是数罪仍存在争议。本文通过对不同行为、目的的各种情形加以分类，通过案例进行分析研究加以区分。同时对于与盗窃罪与故意毁坏财物罪相关、相近的罪名（如故意毁坏文物罪、盗伐林木罪）加以分析研究以更好的区分两罪。
关键词：盗窃罪 故意毁坏财物罪 侵犯财产罪 非法占有目的 毁坏
Abstract：Larceny and crime of deliberate destruction of property can be distinguished by analyzing whether the actors have the conduct of the general purpose of illegal possession. For some use destructive means to steal or damage is based on the purpose of stolen property, and so on. For these situations, to convict larceny or crime of destruction of property, or other offenses, to constitute a crime, or the number of crimes are still controversial. This article classifies kinds of the two crimes’ situations by different behavior, purpose, through some cases to do some analysis. At the same time, by analyzing some related and similar offenses like intentional destruction of cultural relics and rime of illegally chopping down trees, we can distinguish the two crimes better.
Key words: Larceny Deliberate destruction of property Crime against property
Illegal Possession Destruction
盗窃罪与故意毁坏财物罪作为两个高发的财产性犯罪，由于两罪的法定刑相差悬殊，正确区分这两个罪名有着重要的现实意义。虽然两罪在一般情况下容易区分，但由于目前犯罪形式、手法多样化，往往同一行为同时包含了盗窃和故意毁坏而对犯罪行为的定性产生影响。同时，对于与盗窃罪与故意毁坏财物罪相近罪名的区分现实中也存在较多问题。如实施盗窃、故意毁坏时引发的危害公共安全的犯罪，盗窃枪支、弹药罪，盗伐林木罪等，以及近年来多发的关于网络虚拟财产的犯罪，对于“虚拟财产”能否作为财产犯罪的客体，是否适用盗窃、毁坏等仍存在不同见解。本文将通过对上述问题的分析，对盗窃罪与故意毁坏财物罪加以区分。
