摘要：社区治理就是一个由社区内多元组织相互协作，从而形成各组织间的网络关系，提供多样的社区事务的持续过程。而其间所形成的组织间网络关系即构成治理视域下的社区组织结构。平江社区“1+4”的社区组织创新结构，是以党组织领导、居委会自治、工作站承接政府职能、居民事务服务所服务社区的优化组合，使原先比较混乱的社区结构在制度和职能上得以明确和界定。在治理视域下，社区组织结构应体现由“被组织”向“自组织”的转变，纵向上的党政领导性结构关系固然是需要的，而社区党组织与政府组织同时应与社区其他组织发展双向的指导、协商、合作型的平行、横向结构关系。城市社区治理正逐步呈现出政府与社区共同治理、社会各方力量共同参与、社区自组织充分发挥自治功能的格局,而这也将成为我国社区发展的路径参考。
关键词：社区治理 多元组织 合作共治 网络关系 组织结构创新
Abstract:Community governance is a diverse community organizations collaborate to form a network of relationships among the organizations provide a variety of community affairs, ongoing process. And during the formation of network relationships between organizations that constitute the perspective of community governance structure. Pingjiang community ‘1 +4’ structure of community organizational innovation, based on party leaders, neighborhood autonomy, workstations for government functions and services for residents Affairs optimal combination of community service, so that the original chaotic system of community structure and function on to clear and defined. The perspective of governance, organizational structure should reflect the community by ‘being organized’ to ‘self-organization’ changes, the vertical structure on the relationship between party and government leaders of course is needed, and the community both party and government organizations should work with other community two-way organizational development guidance, consultation, co-operative parallel and horizontal structural relationship. Community governance is gradually showing a government and community co-management, social forces to participate in community self-organized pattern of full self-government functions, which will become the path of reference for community development.
Key Words: Community governance Multiple organizations Collaborate Networking Organization Innovation
XX社区组织结构创新是一个相对严密的结构体系，在政府职能转变的过渡期中体现了治理视域下社区治理的主要原则。本文借鉴平江社区的组织结构，力图创新出一种适用于苏州及周边城市的社区组织结构，其中所围绕的要素便是：多元组织、合作共治、回归自治。当然，社区组织结构设置上还有一些深层次的问题有待解决,包括社区长期以来对政府的依赖所产生的惯性，使政府在社区组织结构中的角色比较模糊。此外，还有社区主体参与的更规范的途径，及保障机制等问题。但总的来说，城市社区治理正逐步呈现出政府与社区共同治理、社会各方力量共同参与、社区自组织充分发挥自治功能的格局,而这也将成为我国社区发展的路径参考。
