论我国劳动争议仲裁制度的完善.doc

  • 需要金币800 个金币
  • 资料包括:完整论文
  • 转换比率:金钱 X 10=金币数量, 即1元=10金币
  • 论文格式:Word格式(*.doc)
  • 更新时间:2013-09-15
  • 论文字数:12049
  • 当前位置论文阅览室 > 原创论文 > 法律论文 >
  • 课题来源:(陈老师)提供原创文章

支付并下载

摘要:我国的《劳动争议调解仲裁法》颁布以来,劳动争议仲裁成为保持市场经济劳动关系稳定和顺利发展的一个关键环节。目前我国劳动争议仲裁制度尚不成熟,不能及时、公正、妥善处理劳动争议,存在劳动争议仲裁时效制度的规定不够仔细明确,劳动争议仲裁的举证责任分配不合理等问题,不利于维护劳动关系双方当事人权益,不适应市场经济发展的需要。本文在分析劳动争议仲裁存在的主要问题的基础上,通过借鉴香港地区和德国的可取之处,提出了完善我国劳动争议仲裁制度的具体建议。

关键词:劳动争议仲裁;劳动争议仲裁委员会;劳动争议调解仲裁法

 

Abstract:Since the promulgation of the Arbitration Law of China's labor dispute, labor dispute arbitration plays a crucial role in maintaining labor relations stability and the smooth development of the market economy. The labor dispute arbitration system in China is not yet mature with the facts that it can not deal with labor disputes timely, fair, and properly and there are so many problems which against maintaining the interests of the parties in the labor relations and the requirements suited to the development of the market economic , such as , the provisions of the labor dispute arbitration aging system is not detailed and clear enough , furthermore the distribution of the burden of proof of the labor dispute arbitration is unreasonable , and so on .  On the basis of analyzing the main problems of the labor dispute arbitration, the specific recommendations of the perfection of the labor dispute arbitration system are put forward, by drawing on the merits of Hong Kong and Germany.

Key words: Labor dispute arbitration;Labor dispute arbitration committee;Labor dispute mediation and arbitration law

 

不同的人对劳动争议纠纷的类型划分有不同的看法。有学者提出劳动争议可以依劳动纠纷的种类来确定举证责任。其将劳动纠纷划分为管理纠纷和非管理性质的去职纠纷、待遇纠纷、劳动合同纠纷四类。前者产生于当事人双方管理与被管理的关系,由用人单位举证。后三者属于平等主体的纠纷,采用“谁主张,谁举证”。其他类似观点则把劳动争议案件分为有行政行为和没有行政行为的两种类型,原则上采用“谁主张,谁举证”,对于有行政行为的案件,如用人单位作出开除等处理决定的,实行举证责任倒置。