内容摘要：医疗纠纷是医患双方围绕医疗活动所产生的争议。《医疗事故处理条例》是当前我国处理医疗纠纷的主要法律依据。根据其规定，主要的医疗纠纷解决方式有当事人协商解决、卫生行政部门行政调解和民事诉讼。这三种传统的解纷方式在实践中固然发挥了重要作用，其弊端也是不容忽视的。而相比较而言，医疗纠纷仲裁制度以其特有的优势引起了理论和实践领域的广泛关注。医疗纠纷仲裁制度的建立，无论是在法律基础或实践基础方面都具备可行性。同时，在我国现有的医疗纠纷解决机制的法律、实践背景之下，可以借鉴其他国家和地区的经验，结合我国的实际，进一步完善我国的医疗纠纷仲裁制度。
关键词： 医疗纠纷；仲裁；制度
Abstract: Medical disputes is doctor-patient both surrounding the medical activities generated controversy. The “medical treatment trouble processing regulation” is the main legal basis in this area. According to the regulation, the main medical dispute resolution methods are negotiating a settlement, administrative and civil case in court. These three traditional plural remedy ways in practice are playing important roles in their drawbacks, but their shortcomings can’t be ignored. Relatively speaking, medical disputes arbitration system, with its special advantages caused wide concern of the theory and the practice field. Medical disputes arbitration system establishment, has feasibility, whether in legal basis or practice basis. Meanwhile, in our country's existing medical dispute resolution mechanism under the law, practice background that can be drawn lessons from the experience of other countries and regions, combined with China's reality, and further perfect our country's medical disputes arbitration system.
Key words: Medical disputes；arbitration；system
