摘要:随着互联网技术的应用和发展，一系列与网络虚拟财产有关的问题和纠纷也应运而生，层出不穷，并引起了社会各界的广泛关注，一度成为法律界讨论的热点。理论界对虚拟财产的法律属性存在诸多争议，同时在司法实践中由于相关法律的缺位，导致了虚拟财产纠纷难以得到良好的解决。本文从网络虚拟财产的意义、由来、表现形式出发，通过阐述理论界对网络虚拟财产权的五种观点—物权说、债权说、知识产权说、新型财产权说、分阶段权利说，并且分析评议了这五种学说的合理性和不合理性，最终提出了笔者自己的见解—网络虚拟财产权是有限制（特殊）的物权。
关键词：网络虚拟财产，财产权，属性
Abstract:With the development of the Internet technology application, a series of the problems and disputes of the fictitious property of network also arises,emerge in endlessly,and causes much concern in sociology,it had become a hot debate in law.Theory circle has a lot of disputes on the legal attribute of the virtual property.At the same time as the absence of the related laws in the judicial practice,causes the virtual property dispute is hard to get good solve.This article sets up from the meaning, the origin and forms of the fictitious property of network, and elaborates about the five views -real right view-said,the creditor's rights,intellectual property rights,new property rights,stage rights in theory circle ,and analysis the rationality and irrationality of the five kinds of theories,finally put forward the author's own views-Network virtual property right is limited to the right ( special ).
Key words: The fictitious property of network, property rights, attributes
目前，从美国、韩国、中国以及台湾、香港等国家和地区的司法实践和判例来看，承认虚拟财产的财产属性并且主张对其进行法律保护，已经渐成一种趋势。面对新技术的发展，谁排斥虚拟经济的价值，谁忽略虚拟财产的保护，谁将在未来新技术竞争中处于劣势。因此笔者认为当前最为重要的不是应否赋予虚拟财产以财产权的问题，而是应如何界定虚拟财产权的权利属性以及如何分配该权利的问题。这不仅是现阶段虚拟财产理论研究的重点和难点，也是理论和实务中存在严重分歧之所在。基于此，笔者打算谈谈关于网络虚拟财产权的个人粗略的看法。
