Abstract: This study mainly talks about argumentation theory in the view of conversation analysis. Argumentation theory, originating in logic and philosophy, has a research agenda and methodology that may appear to be different from that of discourse analysis. It deals with one specific verbal activity, the production of arguments in support of a standpoint. Discourse analysis is aimed at describing the forms, practices, patterns, structures, and functions of everyday discourse, and also the procedures and mechanisms through which participants in verbal exchanges. Discourse analysis would not analyse argumentation words in particular, but when it does, the study on the relation of the two branches is definitely valuable. A brief sketch of both discourse analysis and argumentation theory is given. The paper concludes with a summarizing view on how argumentation theory and discourse analysis can benefit to each other.
Key words: argumentation theory; discourse analysis; strategies and principles
摘要：本文主要讨论了会话分析视角下的语用论辩理论。起源于逻辑学和哲学的论辩理论似乎与根源于语言学和民俗方法学的话语分析看起来似乎风马牛不相及，然而话语分析是描述分析日常话语形式，惯例，模式，结构等，通过分析对话双方言语交换的长度，语序，连贯性等特征来探求话语的原理和功能意义。话语分析并不特别地倾向于研究论辩，但是当话语分析理论应用于分析辩论性话语时，上述方法会得以充分运用，所以研究这两种来自不同领域的理论在具体分析描述论辩话语时所起的共同作用显然是有价值的。本文给出了会话分析和语用论辩理论的简明框架,总结了会话分析和语用论辩理论两者之间如何受益于双方。
关键词：语用论辩理论；会话分析；策略原则
