摘要:不方便法院原则，是盛行于普通法系国家的一项重要的司法管辖权制度，在平衡原告、被告间的诉讼利益、缓解管辖权的积极冲突和减轻法院负担、节省司法资源等方面起着重要作用。学者们普遍认为该原则起源于苏格兰，但随着两大法系的交流不断深入，越来越多的大陆法系国家已通过各种形式采用此原则，至于我国是否要适用不方便法院原则，学术界对其仍有不少争议。至今为止，虽然我国法律并无明文规定不方便法院原则，但是在司法实践中已有体现，笔者认为我国引入不方便法律原则不仅是可行的，而且是必然的。在此基础上，本文对我国构建不方便法院原则的几个相关问题进行了研究，并提出了自己的一些浅陋见解。
关键词：不方便法院原则；管辖权冲突；自由裁量权
Abstract:The Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens has prevailed among countries of common law, which has played an important role in balancing the lawsuit interest rights and interest between the plaintiff and the defendant, relieving the conflict of international civil and commercial jurisdiction, reducing the workload of the court and saving the judicial resources. Scholars generally think that the principle originated in Scotland. As the mutual integration of the two law systems, more and more civil law system countries has adopted this principle. As for china, to adopt it or not has caused the widespread dispute among scholars. Though there is no relevant provision in our statute, the people’s court has adopted this doctrine to waive jurisdictions in cases concerning Forum Non Conveniens. It is necessary and feasible to introduce it into Chinese legislation so as to decline jurisdictions upon irrelative litigation. The paper further elaborates several relevant issues and sets out my own immature opinion.
Key words: The Doctrine of Forum Non-conveniens； Conflicts of Jurisdiction； Power of Discretion
